Drug development in oncology is undergoing several changes brought about by precision medicine, which makes it appealing to move efficacy assessment to earlier-phase trials and questions the need for randomized trials. Indeed, some remarkably efficacious drugs have even been approved based on uncontrolled phase I or II trials.
With very few exceptions, we challenge the view that the expected benefits from new drugs are generally sufficient to forgo randomization to a standard-of-care arm. Apparently improved outcomes in a single-arm early trial may be due at least in part to the prognostic nature of the target and to selection bias, rather than result from a true effect of therapy. Moreover, the predictive role of biomarkers cannot be ascertained in a definitive way without randomization to a control arm.
On the other hand, randomization often raises scientific, ethical and economic issues when precision medicine is understood in a very strict sense, according to which each tumor presents a unique molecular landscape in a manner that precludes the formation of groups of patients with a similar disease.
The challenge for the scientific community moving forward will be to strike the right balance between eliciting high-level evidence, such as that originating from randomized trials, and leveraging the full potential of precision medicine.
Date: Thursday, 26th of August 2021
Time: 10:00 – 11:00 CEST
Venue: Online
Program
9:50 | Online platform opens for registering participants |
10:00 | Welcome David Munis Zepernick, Head of Business Development and Public Affairs, Medicon Valley Alliance |
10:05 | Randomization and the limits of precision oncology Everardo Saad, Medical Director, IDDI |
10:50 | Q&A |
11:00 | End of webinar |
Speaker
Organized by | In collaboration with |
![]() |
![]() |